Skip to main content

How can a turned-off phone be harmful?

 

How can a turned-off phone be harmful? Yes, this is not a typo)) We all know that smartphone addiction is dangerous for our mental health (increased anxiety, etc.), physical health (sedentary lifestyle), and social health (deterioration of relationships). But it is important to remember that even a turned off phone can have a negative impact on our cognitive abilities and our relationships.

Scientists call this the “mere presence effect”. When a phone is within sight (even if it is upside down), it still leads to us expending additional cognitive resources on it (thinking about who might have messaged or liked something, resisting the temptation to check it, etc.). All of this leaves fewer cognitive resources available for other tasks. Therefore, in studies, participants perform worse on tests of learning, memory, and attention when a phone is within sight compared to when a notebook is within sight.

When we talk to people, the presence of a phone (even a turned off one) also leads to a lower quality of communication. Intimacy, significance, trust, and empathy all decrease. The closer the conversation partner and the more important the conversation, the greater the negative impact on communication quality. The possible mechanism is cognitive distortion, which impairs our ability to reflect on and understand the conversation partner, or frequent diversion of our gaze to the phone. Simply glancing at the phone for a second breaks eye contact and can reduce the release of oxytocin, which impairs the feeling of connection between conversation partners.

So, what should you do?

  1. Understand that the mere presence of a turned-off phone already affects your behavior.

Those who suffer more from smartphone addiction benefit from its absence from sight.

2. A phone in silent mode, upside down, or turned off (but within sight) does not work. It is better to keep it in a bag or drawer, but it is even better not to have it in the room at all.

3. Keeping the phone out of sight can have very positive effects on your cognitive abilities and improve the quality of communication. Do not touch your phone during conversations.

Mobile phones: The effect of its presence on learning and memory PLoS One. 2020; 15(8): e0219233.

PLoS One. 2020; 15(8): e0219233. Mobile phones: The effect of its presence on learning and memory

Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity

Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30(3)

How bad is the mere presence of a phone? A replication of Przybylski and Weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity PLoS One. 2021; 16(6): e0251451.

The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environ Behav. 2016. Feb;48(2): 275–298.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Mackerel for breakfast in numbers.

Mackerel for breakfast and not only for it, measured in numbers. The most common fish in our diet is mackerel (whole and deep frozen). The reasons for this are that it is a Norwegian wild-caught fish delivered in good condition to a relatively small number of bones (children eat it with them while herring, for comparison, has a lot of small bones).  Usually, I eat a medium mackerel at a time (350 grams), equal to a portion of boiled mackerel of 250 grams. What does this mean in numbers? So, one mackerel is 550 kcal, 50 grams of high-quality protein , and 36 grams of excellent fat.  It is also 129 micrograms of selenium ( more than 200% of the daily requirement) and 135 micrograms of iodine (almost complete daily requirement).  If to talk about omega-3 fatty acids, one fish contains 3.6 grams of omega-3 fatty acids. As you can see, there is no need to take additional supplements if even you consume only 2-3 portions of fish per week. Fish...
Read more

False invincibility (invulnerability).

False invincibility (invulnerability). American economist Samuel Peltzman discovered and described the cognitive bias of false invincibility, which states that people are more likely to take risks when they feel more protected (Peltzman Effect or risk compensation). This phenomenon manifests itself in various areas of life: when people begin to trust a salesperson, they are inclined to buy things they didn’t plan to buy; a person carrying a weapon behaves more recklessly, provoking aggression; even when wearing a mask, we tend to ignore illness symptoms and neglect basic hygiene rules, thereby increasing the risk of infection; a soldier wearing body armor moves less carefully and safely. A similar effect is observed when we protect ourselves from the sun. The effectiveness of sunscreen is calculated for ideal conditions, but in reality, people apply it unevenly, rarely reapply it, and so on. Most importantly, when using sunscreen, people spend much more time in the sun than they would ...
Read more