Skip to main content

Take a walk after each meal

 

Shatapawali. Doctors in various cultures have come to the same advice of walking after meals (although they explained it differently). In Ancient China, a proverb advised “Fan hou bai bu zou, huo dao jiu shi jiu,” meaning take 100 steps after eating if you want to live until 99 years old. In India, there even existed a specific term — shatapawali (Shatapawali), which literally means “hundred steps” (after eating). And Hippocrates wrote, “Walking after dinner dries the belly, reduces the accumulation of fat in the abdomen (visceral fat).” In Italy, this is called passeggiata — a leisurely walk for pleasure, often after a meal, especially dinner.

Just a 10–15 minute walk after eating is enough to significantly reduce glucose spikes and lower risks. Our muscles act as a buffer that can absorb excess fats and glucose. The problem is that when we sit or lie down, our major muscles are not active. Even moderate physical activity increases the activity of the GLUT-4 transporter protein on the membranes of skeletal muscles, which further stimulates glucose uptake from the blood. By the way, walking before a meal does not have the same effect on glucose levels.

The more food you have eaten and the more carbohydrates, the longer the walk should be. Scientists have shown that three 15-minute walks after each meal significantly reduce the risk of developing diabetes compared to one 45-minute walk. Even a light walk is effective. If you really don’t have time, studies have shown that even working while standing is effective. When you stand, the muscles that support your body are active — and 2 hours of standing work after eating reduces the peak glucose rise by 43%. Research has shown that half an hour of walking after a meal allows you to lose more weight than walking an hour later.

What does this mean?

Take a walk after eating or work while standing — it is a simple and effective way to smooth out glucose spikes (especially important to walk after dinner, as insulin sensitivity is lower in the evening).

You can use glucose monitoring to find the most effective time and speed for your walk.

Avoid prolonged sitting; any activity, even micro-breaks and small episodes of activity, help maintain normal glucose levels.

Three 15-min bouts of moderate postmeal walking significantly improve 24-h glycemic control in older people at risk for impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care, 2013
Slow postmeal walking reduces postprandial glycemia in middle-aged women Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2009 Dec;34(6):1087–92.
Standing-based office work shows encouraging signs of attenuating post-prandial glycaemic excursion Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2014;71:109–111.
Postprandial walking is better for lowering the glycemic effect of dinner than pre-dinner exercise in type 2 diabetic individuals J Am Med Dir Assoc 2009 Jul;10(6):394–7.

Popular posts from this blog

Respect for reality as a duty of a true gentleman

  What we “see” is a mixture of two completely different streams of information — a top-down and a bottom-up one. One comes from sensory organs, the other from our expectations — and they can blend in the most bizarre ways. When reality is very bad, when there is neither strength nor desire to engage with it, and there is a desperate longing and expectation for improvement and hope — then we begin to go blind. We stop seeing reality and start seeing our own desires, taking what is wished for as what is real. This self-deception effect is well described in the writings of people who survived concentration camps (both Nazi and Soviet). Prisoners begin to believe that the guards actually sympathize with them and are completely on their side — only secretly. Their brain, like Skinner’s pigeon, begins to interpret the most ordinary gestures and words as hidden codes of support and sympathy. And the cruelty of the guards is interpreted by these prisoners as a form of disgui...

How social status affects health and longevity

Social Status: The Numbers Tell the Story Social status — a person’s position in society — is one of the most powerful and least discussed determinants of health and lifespan. The data are unambiguous and span every domain of achievement: Olympic champions live 2.8–3 years longer than other Olympic participants. Nobel laureates live 1.4–2 years longer than scientists who were merely nominated but did not receive the prize, and 6–8 years longer than the average scientist. Academy Award winners live 4 years longer than other professional actors. Among academics, holders of doctoral degrees outlive candidates, and candidates outlive those without advanced degrees.  These are not comparisons between healthy and unhealthy people, or between rich and poor people. They are comparisons within elite populations — people with access, education, and resources — where the single varying factor is rank . The conclusion is unavoidable: status itself changes biology. Status Anxiety...