Skip to main content

Three paradoxes of vitamin D

 

Three paradoxes of vitamin D and how to overcome them.
 
1. The paradox of vitamin D supplements.
 
In many studies, high levels of vitamin D are associated with a reduced risk of many diseases, from cancer and autoimmune diseases to obesity and diabetes. The quality and reliability of these studies are beyond doubt. However, conversely, vitamin D supplements do not reduce the risks of diseases almost anywhere. Why? Two possible explanations for the paradox:
1. Vitamin D is a surrogate marker of health, meaning it is higher in those who spend more time outdoors, meaning they are more physically active, socialize more, etc.
2. Sunlight (ultraviolet) induces the formation of about a dozen beneficial compounds besides vitamin D (such as nitric oxide, beneficial for lowering blood pressure and for erection, or proopiomelanocortin, etc.) – one supplement cannot replicate their synergistic effect. What to do? Prefer sunlight, even in winter countries.
 
 

 
2. The Mediterranean paradox of vitamin D.
 
Vitamin D deficiency in sunny countries such as Greece, Cyprus, or Australia is observed unusually often (39.5% of our population was severely vitamin D deficient (levels below 12.5 ng/mL, despite the high percentage of sunny days in Athens). What is the reason? There are changes in lifestyle (indoor lifestyle), such as when people work in offices, relax at home or on terraces, and travel by car. 
 
Vitamin is produced in the skin only when your shadow is equal to or shorter than your height - due to the angle of sunlight. An evening walk will not help you maintain your vitamin D level. Active use of sunscreen, demonization of the sun as an oncogen, and air pollution reduce vitamin D production, even in very sunny countries. What to do? Be more often in safe sunlight.
 
3. The fat paradox of vitamin D.
 
The more fat you have, the lower your vitamin D level. As a fat-soluble compound, it accumulates in adipose tissue, and decreased fat-burning reduces the availability of vitamin D. Evolutionarily, it was intended that during a hungry winter, you lose weight - and as you lose weight, vitamin D comes out into the blood. But alas, nowadays we gain weight in winter. For example, a person weighing 100 kg with 40% fat reserves of vitamin D in fat will last for 2000 days, taking into account the recommended daily dose! A six-year supply! But the person himself may suffer from vitamin D deficiency! The higher the level of physical activity, the higher the vitamin D level in the blood. What to do? Physical activity and normal body weight will give you an optimal vitamin D level. 
 
 
Ultraviolet Radiation Suppresses Obesity and Symptoms of Metabolic Syndrome Independently of Vitamin D in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet Diabetes 2014 Nov; 63(11): 3759-3769.).
The vitamin D paradox: high prevalence of deficiency in sunny Athens (Greece) Ann Res Hosp 2019;3:
Paradoxical suboptimal vitamin D levels in a Mediterranean area: a population-based study Sci Rep 2022 Nov 16;12(1):19645.
Mobilising vitamin D from adipose tissue: The potential impact of exercise Nutrition Bulletin 18 December 2019 Pages 25-35

Popular posts from this blog

Mackerel for breakfast in numbers.

Mackerel for breakfast and not only for it, measured in numbers. The most common fish in our diet is mackerel (whole and deep frozen). The reasons for this are that it is a Norwegian wild-caught fish delivered in good condition to a relatively small number of bones (children eat it with them while herring, for comparison, has a lot of small bones).  Usually, I eat a medium mackerel at a time (350 grams), equal to a portion of boiled mackerel of 250 grams. What does this mean in numbers? So, one mackerel is 550 kcal, 50 grams of high-quality protein , and 36 grams of excellent fat.  It is also 129 micrograms of selenium ( more than 200% of the daily requirement) and 135 micrograms of iodine (almost complete daily requirement).  If to talk about omega-3 fatty acids, one fish contains 3.6 grams of omega-3 fatty acids. As you can see, there is no need to take additional supplements if even you consume only 2-3 portions of fish per week. Fish...

False invincibility (invulnerability).

False invincibility (invulnerability). American economist Samuel Peltzman discovered and described the cognitive bias of false invincibility, which states that people are more likely to take risks when they feel more protected (Peltzman Effect or risk compensation). This phenomenon manifests itself in various areas of life: when people begin to trust a salesperson, they are inclined to buy things they didn’t plan to buy; a person carrying a weapon behaves more recklessly, provoking aggression; even when wearing a mask, we tend to ignore illness symptoms and neglect basic hygiene rules, thereby increasing the risk of infection; a soldier wearing body armor moves less carefully and safely. A similar effect is observed when we protect ourselves from the sun. The effectiveness of sunscreen is calculated for ideal conditions, but in reality, people apply it unevenly, rarely reapply it, and so on. Most importantly, when using sunscreen, people spend much more time in the sun than they would ...